Jurisprudential study of the Miqat of Dhul-Hulaifa

In most branches of jurisprudence, there are issues that not all jurists have the same view on. Among them, the Miqat of Dhul-Hulaifa is one of the issues that has been raised with different and diverse jurisprudential views. The study of this issue is important from two perspectives; first, from the perspective of all Islamic scholars and jurists, Ihram is considered the first part of Hajj that must be performed before other acts of Hajj, and second, Ihram must be from the times and places that the Holy Prophet (PBUH) has specified. This research was conducted using an analytical-descriptive method and citing library sources and found that there are four jurisprudential views from the Imamiyyah jurists regarding Ihram from Miqat of Dhul-Hulaifa; the validity of Ihram from outside the Masjid al-Shajarah, the obligation of Ihram from inside the mosque based on precaution, the obligation of Ihram from inside the mosque for those who are not excused, and the absolute obligation of Ihram from inside the Masjid al-Shajarah are the jurisprudential views that have been presented regarding Ihram from Dhul-Hulaifa. The differences in views and opinions regarding the jurisprudential ruling on Ihram from Dhul-Hulaifa are rooted in the narrations on this issue.